Saturday, November 7, 2026

I like NYT Columnist, Jamelle Bouie: "Republicans watched, in silence, as the president’s roving thugs shot multiple people dead in the street." (And now, "it was as close as an American political party gets to total collapse — not a defeat but a catastrophic rout."

 


Excerpt: "For the Republicans, it was as close as an American political party gets to total collapse — not a defeat but a catastrophic rout.

There is an obvious question to ask here: What happened? How, two years after its first presidential popular vote win in a generation, did the Republican Party disintegrate on renewed contact with voters?"

Jamelle Bouie
November 7, 2026
A photo illustration of a woman dressed in red standing among a few other people in red near the Capitol.
Photo Illustration by Will Matsuda for The New York Times

Six years ago, after Joe Biden won his narrow victory over Donald Trump, I wrote that the president’s defeat wasn’t a repudiation as much as it was a split decision, “an uncertain result for an uncertain time in American life.” The political trench warfare of the previous four years would continue. There would be no repudiation of either Trump or Trumpism.

That is, until now.

On Tuesday, Democrats won the largest midterm victory either party has seen since the post-Watergate elections of 1974 and 1976, which swept Richard Nixon’s Republican Party out of Washington. They won everywhere, with nearly total victories in states as different as Texas, Georgia and Wisconsin. They won seats in the longtime conservative strongholds of Kansas and South Carolina and shattered the electoral coalition that gave Trump his second term. As the dust began to settle, Democrats held the majority of governorships, a suite of new state trifectas, a 54-seat majority in the U.S. Senate that may well grow and something north of a 250-seat majority in the House of Representatives.

For the Republicans, it was as close as an American political party gets to total collapse — not a defeat but a catastrophic rout.

There is an obvious question to ask here: What happened? How, two years after its first presidential popular vote win in a generation, did the Republican Party disintegrate on renewed contact with voters?

Of the Notorious B.I.G.’s “Ten Crack Commandments,” Number 4 is probably the most important: Never use what you sell, never get high on your own supply. Doing so is an easy way to lose perspective, act recklessly and make choices that threaten the entire enterprise.

The midterms were such a seismic political event that there is an overwhelming amount to unpack, break down and analyze. But if there is a single diagnosis you might make of the Republican Party’s generational defeat at the ballot box, it is that from Trump down, the party got high, ruinously high, on its own supply.

Trump and his allies looked at the 2024 election as an enabling act for all of their most radical aspirations. They saw the president’s popular vote victory and relative down-ballot success as a mandate that handed them the keys to American politics and culture. This was the “vibe shift”; the idea that Trump had not won an office but had built a new MAGA majority, a realignment that would shape American politics for the duration. It was a message that quite a few people wanted to hear, as it dovetailed with an elite “anti-woke” backlash and a revolt of capital against a strong, worker-friendly labor market.

For Republicans, the idea that Trump had engendered a vibe shift — and that the whole nation was now Mar-a-Lago — was reason enough to commit entirely to the president’s authoritarian agenda. Republicans sat back and either watched or cheered as the White House, drunk with power, attempted to rip up American democracy and turn the United States into a personalist autocracy.

Republicans backed Trump as he made Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection a roving deportation force, putting tens of billions of dollars into kidnapping Americans from their homes and workplaces and terrorizing entire communities. Republicans backed the military occupations of American cities and the president’s move to treat Democratic-led cities and states as conquered territory.

Republicans sat back as Trump imposed disastrous tariffs, shipped immigrants to foreign prisons, tried to destroy independent news media and worked to dismantle the nation’s institutions of public health and higher education. Republicans watched, in silence, as the president’s roving thugs shot multiple people dead in the street.

If the Trump administration was high on its own victory, then the Republican Party did not just share in that irrational exuberance but facilitated it and allowed it to run out of control. It made itself a partner to Trump’s tyranny in virtually every instance. And when Trump demanded that Republicans take steps to block meaningful political opposition with an unprecedented campaign of mid-decade redistricting, most agreed, eager to do what they could to stop the public from holding the president accountable.

The results on Tuesday cannot be understood outside of the hubris of Trump and the Republican Party; outside of its belief that it had insulated itself from popular discontent; that it had, in some sense, won politics and that Trump had fully escaped the pull of political gravity.

But this was delusional. It was delusional then, after the 2024 election, when Trump and his party were euphoric with anticipation, and it was especially delusional as this year progressed and November loomed larger on the calendar.

What is true of the physical world is true of the political one: With every action comes an equal and opposite reaction. A de facto ethnic cleansing campaign aimed at Hispanics as such, and not merely at “criminal illegal aliens,” produced a swing among Hispanic voters so large that it did the previously unthinkable: it flipped Texas blue across the board, in a Southwestern shift reminiscent of the transformation that hit California in the aftermath of the anti-immigrant Proposition 187.

In the states of the Deep South, the Supreme Court’s destruction of the Voting Rights Act — and the Trump administration’s broad hostility to diversity, inclusion and the presence of Black Americans in the highest reaches of public life and government service — triggered a counter-mobilization so large that it flipped South Carolina’s Senate seat and may well do the same for Mississippi, in addition to nearly closing the gap in Florida and Louisiana.

And the stunning shift in the Midwest, as well as the states bordering Canada, is a clear reaction to the president’s economic policies, his tariffs and his war, which have made life more difficult for farmers and blue-collar workers.

A Trump administration and a Republican Party that had a realistic sense of its 2024 victory, that saw it not as a decisive cultural settlement but as a narrow and contingent win whose durability would depend entirely on the president’s ability to deliver for the voters who joined his side, would have made more measured choices. It would have put a lid on Stephen Miller’s demagogic dreams of demographic transformation, kept Elon Musk far away from the levers of government and told Russell Vought to put the brakes on his grand ambition to traumatize the Civil Service. It would never have put Pete Hegseth in a position of authority and would not have launched a war with Iran. It would have tried to deliver economic relief and avoid major cultural conflicts. It would have tried to cement and build on its victory, not take it for granted.

But asking Trump and the people around him to show humility is like asking the scorpion not to sting the frog. MAGA is a faction devoted to the subordination of those it believes to be its racial inferiors and cultural and political enemies. It rejects pluralism and democratic deliberation in favor of authoritarian homogeneity. Its hubris was inevitable. They are who they are.

It is on that note that I will say that Democrats should also not get too high on their own supply. This has a somewhat different valence for the Democratic Party, which has too often been afraid of its own shadow. The temptation of some in its ranks is to downplay the implications of its victory, to say that the party is not especially popular with the public and should keep its ambitions in check.

But that is silly. Tuesday was a mandate, if not for Democrats qua Democrats then for consequences and accountability for this administration. The American people voted against Republicans to end corruption, to reject authoritarian rule and to assert control over their own lives and communities in the face unaccountable corporations, billionaire oligarchs and their allies in government.

For Democrats to get too high on their own supply, then, is for Democrats to retreat to the idea that the only thing that mattered were a set of narrow “kitchen table issues” — and to shy away from taking bold action to clean house in Washington.

And so, in addition to heeding Biggie Smalls’s fourth crack commandment, Democrats should also take the advice of another hip-hop luminary, Big Daddy Kane. In a fight such as this one — a fight for the survival of American democracy — there simply ain’t no half-steppin’.

What I Wrote

My column this week was a look at how President Trump leveraged the entire federal government to try to subvert the midterm elections. He failed, but the attempt illustrates his contempt for democracy and the threat he continues to pose to the Constitution.

The core of the problem is that Trump turned the federal government against American democracy in a relentless effort to challenge, subvert and undermine the nation’s election infrastructure. All in an effort to disrupt the conduct of free and fair elections and hold on to power in the face of popular discontent.

I gave a few thoughts on the election in an Opinion roundup of Tuesday night. I joined my colleagues to talk about our takeaways from the election on video. And Michelle Cottle, David French and I taped a live episode of “The Opinions” at the Brooklyn Public Library on Thursday. Elsewhere, I talked about the movies “Collateral Damage” and “Clear and Present Danger” on the Trade Movies Podcast.

Now Reading

Mark O’Connell on JD Vance for The New York Review of Books.

Susan B. Glasser on America’s first truly anti-Trump election result for The New Yorker.

David Dayen on what progressives hope to do to deliver on their promises for The American Prospect.

Sherrilyn Ifill on the midterm results for her Substack newsletter.

Stacey Abrams on what Democrats need to do next for her Substack newsletter.

Photo of the Week

A memorial to Robert Smalls, with a plaque and a bust.

A memorial to Representative Robert Smalls in his hometown, Beaufort, S.C. Smalls, whose daring escape from slavery during the Civil War is the stuff of Hollywood, was one of the first Black Americans elected to Congress during Reconstruction.

Now Eating: Cuban Black Beans

I made a big pot of black beans this week and I’ve been eating them with various meals. Here is a good recipe if you would like to do the same. I usually use smoked turkey instead of bacon and greatly reduce the salt — start with one teaspoon kosher salt and add more as needed. Serve with white rice or a nice piece of crusty bread. Recipe from NYT Cooking.

Ingredients

  • 1 ½ green peppers, stemmed and seeded
  • 10 garlic cloves
  • 1 pound dried black beans, rinsed and picked over to remove any stones
  • 1 smoked ham hock
  • 2 bay leaves
  • 5 teaspoons salt, or to taste
  • ¼ cup olive oil
  • 4 slices thick bacon, cut into ½-inch pieces
  • 1 Spanish onion, diced
  • 1 jalapeño, stemmed and finely chopped
  • 1 teaspoon dried oregano
  • ½ teaspoon ground cumin
  • ½ teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
  • 3 tablespoons distilled white vinegar
  • 1 tablespoon turbinado or other brown sugar

Directions

Cut 1 green pepper into 1-inch squares. Smash and peel 4 of the garlic cloves. Put the green pepper and garlic into a large pot with the beans, ham hock, bay leaves and 1 tablespoon salt. Add 2 quarts water and bring to a boil. Cover the pot and simmer until the beans are tender, an hour or more.

Meanwhile, make a sofrito. Cut the remaining ½ green pepper into ¼-inch dice. Peel and finely chop the remaining garlic. Heat the olive oil in a very large skillet over medium-high heat. Add the bacon and cook, stirring occasionally, until it starts to brown, about 5 minutes. Add the green pepper and onion and cook, stirring, until slightly softened, about 3 minutes. Add the remaining garlic, jalapeño (leave out the seeds if you don’t want it too spicy), oregano, cumin, black pepper and 2 teaspoons salt and stir for another minute. Pour in the vinegar and scrape any browned bits from bottom of pan with a wooden spoon. This is your sofrito.

When the beans are cooked, discard the bay leaf. Remove and set aside the ham hock and let it cool. Transfer 1 cup of beans to small bowl, mash them into a paste with the back of a fork and return to the pot. Add the sofrito, then the sugar. Pull the meat from the ham hock, leaving behind any white sinew or gristle. Chop the ham into ½-inch pieces and return it to the bean pot.

Stir the beans well and bring to a boil over medium heat, then lower to a simmer and cook, uncovered, for 20 minutes or so, skimming any foam from the top. Taste for salt and serve with white rice.

IN THE TIMES

Lydia Polgreen

In Michigan, the Gamble Paid Off

Abdul El-Sayed’s victory answers several questions.

By Lydia Polgreen

Michelle Cottle

Maine Voters Finally Saw Through Susan Collins

One of the greatest survivors in U.S. politics finally falls.

By Michelle Cottle

Michelle Goldberg

This Is a Huge Psychological Blow to Republicans

For Republicans, Texas has long been a dependable political anchor. Now, it’s finally blue.

By Michelle Goldberg

Guest Essay

The Quiet Brilliance of Adam Hamilton’s Kansas Campaign

What’s stunning about his win is that it wasn’t a surprise by Election Day.

By E.J. Dionne Jr.

Adam Hamilton in profile, with light glinting off his glasses.

Thanks for reading. You will soon start to get my columns emailed to you too.

Read past editions of the newsletter here.

If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here.

Have feedback? Send me a note at jamelle-newsletter@nytimes.com.

You can also follow me on Twitter (@jbouie), Instagram and TikTok.

Portrait of Jamelle Bouie

If you received this newsletter from someone else, subscribe here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Jamelle Bouie from The New York Times.

To stop receiving Jamelle Bouie, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings.

Monday, November 2, 2026

(2nd Edition) How To Insure Prosperity For Every American (As Norway Has Already Done With Its Citizens): Our Need A New Social Contract Under Aegis Of "Promoting The General Welfare"

Ironically, the United States will have great healthcare, at a tiny fraction of the cost.

And it's going to be so easy.

And the government will pay for it.

Details below...


Dear Ger,

I have only read the Table of Contents of your new book, "From Medical Care to Mangled Care." It is very well written.  You know your stuff inside-out, and not just academically.

You have an abundance of real-world knowledge, including your illustrious career at Bonadio & Co., and your up-close, on-site study of single-payer health systems in Canada, England, France, and Russia.

Even without reading your manuscript, I'm sure the final edition will be GREAT.

Furthermore, I doubt there would be any substantive benefit were I to comment on the specifics of what you've written. 

However, one of my personal strengths is contextualizing "things" from overlooked points of view. Here's an example:

As I like to say, "The fullness of truth is only found in rich contextualization," and so my ability to provide context could be important for you.

Since, at your request, I have not read the manuscript of "Mangled Care"," I might be wrong. But I feel confident you have not ventured very deeply into the domain of "policy recommendations," particularly as future policy might benefit from concrete proposals to secure the monetary wherewithal to afford a redesigned political-economy that would elicit the transformation of our current democratic-capitalist system so that we would, in fact, be able to provide top-notch health care and dental care to every American.

Late in life, Dad "took me aside" to say that I was "his boy." 

Clearly his love for all five of us was extraordinary, and he did not stint in the love he showered on us all.

But I think my venturesomeness -- both geographically and politically -- appealed to him, just as Norman Thomas, the Socialist Party Candidate for president in 1948 attracted Dad mightily, leading him to vote "Socialist." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Thomas 

Notably, Norman Thomas was Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "unofficial policymaker" for much of Roosevelt's "New Deal," including the establishment of Social Security.

Mind you, Dad did not vote "Social Democrat." 

He voted straight-up Socialist, 78 years before Bernie and AOC came on the scene.

Please read this Google AI overview in response to my inquiry, "To what extent was Norman Thomas foundational to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "New Deal?" https://share.google/aimode/9l0345Wy9kJUicL0l

If my surmise is correct, I think Dad recognized the kind of "visionary" in me that resided in himself - the kind of visionary that also resided deep inside Presbyterian minister, Norman Thomas, a card-carrying member of America's "Socialist Party."

My proposal:

By word count, 1.2% of your autobiography, "Underestimated, Mentally Ill, Yet Successful!" was written by me; my reflection on Dad and Mom's bedrock teaching that we siblings always contemplate the crucial difference between "need" and "want," and that we focus, primarily, on what is necessary, not so much on what we want.

In  your new book, "From Mangaged Care To Mangled Care," I am not asking that you dedicate 1.2% of textual space to my proposed contribution to your new book. 

I am only asking that -- as a postscript -- that you include a link to my blog post below. 

I turn 80 next August: clearly, I am nearing the end of my life.

Juar last month, I experienced an epiphany that America is vanishingly unlikely to emerge from its current political quandary in one piece, even if Democrats win resoundingly in this year's mid-terms ... even if we "donkeys" go on to win the Presidency in 2028.

You can even change the title of my blogpost to suit your own purpose, and am wide open to considering your suggestions concerning possible changes in my text.

In summary...

It might be beneficial to include reference to my blog post, How To Insure Prosperity For Every American (As Norway Has Already Done With Its Citizens): Our Need For A New Social Contract Under Aegis Of "Promoting The General Welfare."  https://newsfrombarbaria.blogspot.com/2026/10/a-slightly-modified-version-of-my-blog.html

What do you say?

Include a postscript of 28 words?

Such inclusion would, I think, fill what is, perhaps, an important gap in your exceptionally well-done book on "Mangled Care."

And although it's just a guess, I think Dad would consider it a good idea.

28 words...

Thanks for reading my writing below.

And thanks for thinking it over.

This is NOT socialism.
It is Common Wealth.
(In the future, whenever anyone on the right side of the aisle throws the word "socialist" our way, ALWAYS begin your reply: "Oh, you mean the Commonwealth.") 

After multiple attempts, I have decided to re-write the following essay as a pronunciamiento.

If we do not redistribute wealth by way of deliberate policy-making, a social breakdown will force civil-war/chaos-revolution on the "United" States.

In the grand scheme of things, these ugly outcomes - baked into the current cake - may be what we need to purge ourselves of the evil that befouls our land.

If not radically changed, the current System is incapable of leading us anywhere but deeper into Authoritarian Absolutism (also known as "corporatocracy"), an outcome indistinguishable from Hitler's aim during his rise to power in the 1930s, whilst "the good Germans" rationalized his increasingly belligerent, increasingly fascist, Third Reich.

With an eye to the future, I do not want my children to suffer such turmoil, chaos and pain under the umbrella of increasingly normalized corporacratic Cruelty.

The Normalization Of Cruelty During Donald Trump's Administration: A Compendium  (Updated July 6, 2025)


Consider the heart of the matter.

Here is what we can really do, because it has already been done.

Norway has succeeded in redistributing wealth by determining that massive amounts of wealth are "common-wealth." For nearly 50 years, Norway has made every Norwegian man, woman and child wealthy -- all 5.9 million of them -- by dedicating the nation's North Sea oil profits to a Sovereign Wealth Fund.

Video about Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund   https://www.facebook.com/reel/1537857818009298

Excerpt from Google AI's overview of Norway's "Sovereign Wealth Fund": 
  • Purpose: Established in 1990 to invest surplus revenues from Norway's North Sea oil and gas production, shielding the economy from oil-price swings and saving money for future generations. [1, 2]
  • Size & Scope: Valued at over $2.2–$2.3 trillion, Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund owns roughly 1.5% of all listed shares in the world, holding stakes in more than 7,000 to 10,000 global companies (including tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Nvidia). [1, 2, 3]
Here is the link to Google AI's entire overview of Norway's "Sovereign Wealth Fund": https://share.google/aimode/VrydKkZWi3i3d3Ucs  


We Americans have been conditioned by unregulated, winner-take-all, "Cowboy" Capitalism, to accept - and even champion - psycho-social degradation and widespread economic pauperization by Ultra-Wealthy oligarchs, plutocrats and kakistocrats. 

These fundamentally exploitative people are "true believers" in an essentially heartless system: “Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work together for the benefit of all.”


We have ALL been bamboozled by Dominance-Submission Hierarchies to accept our cruel colonization at the hands of people who "love money," and by supporting Donald Trump, approve his Cruelty, both murderous and mundane. 

"The Love Of Money Is The Root Of All Evil" - An Open Invitation To Christian Conservatives
(Even if you despise Christianity, St. Paul cuts to the quick of our crisis 
by observing that "the love of money is the root of all evil.")


Here is where unbridled greed -- "the love of money" -- has gotten us:

The Normalization Of Cruelty During Donald Trump's Administration: A Compendium


All of us -- yes, even we liberals, progressives, radicals and revolutionaries -- remain relatively quiet about the bottomline Horror - The Grotesquerie - as long as our "numbers" come up... as long as WE have health insurance, as long as WE have IRAs and 401(k)s, as long as we have Social Security payouts that enable us to "get by" if we really tighten our belts.

But at bedrock, we overlook tens of millions of Americans whose numbers did not "come up" - Americans without proper healthcare, nor dental care of any kind, nor money to get them through even tiny setbacks, not to mention major crises.
  • Jimmy Carter: "The measure of a society is found in how they treat their weakest and most helpless citizens." 
  •  Tolstoy: "I sit on a man's back, choking him and making him carry me, and yet assure myself and others that I am very sorry for him and wish to ease his lot by all possilbe means - except by getting off his back."  (Or, in the United States of America, by getting our knee off his neck.)

I have siblings -- every one of them extraordinarily good, generous people -- who have been conditioned to believe (and understandably so) that "the poor will always be with us." And so, they decline, pretty much unconsciously, "to take up arms against a sea of troubles, and by opposing end them." https://poets.org/poem/hamlet-act-iii-scene-i-be-or-not-be

Almost all of us - myself  included - have been systematically conditioned by piggish people -- squeaky clean, well-dressed people fundamentally indistinguishable from Donald Trump -- to accept the overarching oppression the increasing piggishness of plutocrats by submitting ourselves to the craven asumption that "it's just the way it is." 


Ritual Purity and Yeshua's "Whited Sepulchers"

And so, we do not even champion the poor and the marginalized, nor those people who have fallen off the edge of our increasingly flat world - people who find themselves in never-ending freefall.

 We do not draw a red line in the sand, clearly identifying the piggishness that will do us in, if we don't take an unbudgeable stand. 


Like Charlie Kirk says, "Prove me wrong."
 
We are running out of time to do something bold and decisive to accomplish the doable goal of "saving the world" before people -- degraded by the poverty, despair, and resignation wrought by grotesque wealth inequality -- give up and go along with the plutocratic (and increasingly kakistocratic) takeover of The American Experiment.

This takeover has been enabled by the precipitous decline of virtue as defined (and deemed indispensable) by The Founding Fathers. 

Consider AI Google's review of Virtue's indispensable role: Jeffrey Rosen, head of the United States Constitution Center, has written an enlightening book about the central role of "virtue" in the political thought of America's first revolutionaries: 


"Hostile Takeover Capitalism," as practiced in the United States of America, is hell-bent on political, social, economic, and environmental dystopia. 

Barring divine intervention, it is nearly impossible for me to believe that people who don't step up to support a "Common Wealth" are doing anything but signing off on the replacement of our self-governing Republic with a plutocracy-kleptocracy led by cruel, avaricious people who will degrade the country and its citizens... without end.

The old remedies, based on business-as-usual, will no longer work.

This is "the two-minute warning," folks.

Get on board, or implicitly surrender your souls to the foul regime of Trump-Musk-Bezos-Thiel.




Note well.

Elon Musk has become the world's first trillionaire. 

And like other ultra-rich Americans, he holds an automatic free pass that places him above the Law, just like his partners-in-crime, Trump, Zuckerberg, Bezos et al.

Again:

"Of the 195 economies tracked by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), 174 countries have a nominal GDP of less than $1 trillion." (Here is AI's entire reply to the question, "How many countries have less than $1 trillion dollars in Gross Domestic Product?" 
Google AI Overview - https://share.google/aimode/uEqyNToVHIdGreBQX   

If this deliberate - and accelerating - income inequality is how Uncle Sam's "Democratic Capitalism" works, then American capitalism is predatory, piggish, and ultimately cruel.

"War Is A Racket. I Was A Gangster For Wall Street - A Racketeer For Capitalism" These Are Verbatim Quotes By Major General Smedley Butler, Marine Corps Commandant, The Most Decorated Soldier Of His Time


Updated Compendium Of Pax-Barbaria Posts Concerning The Ravages Of Capitalism - Personal, Interpersonal, Political, Social, Economic and Environmental, 4/17/2026


We Americans, conditioned by our increasingly corrupt system of "Democratic Capitalism", rarely, if ever, talk about the citizenry's psychological and spiritual degradation. Keep in mind that a record number of 75,000,000 Americans voted for Donald Trump in 2024 to elect him a second time! 

Here's the "kicker."

It is virtually unmentionable that the engine propelling our degradation is American capitalism.

Elon Musk plays a decisive role in Russia's war on Ukraine

Starlink should be nationalized. As I see it, the company can remain under Musk's direction, but at least 5% of its annual profits will be put in a Common Wealth Fund for the benefit of the American people. 

If we act on our evident need to nationalize Starlink before Musk becomes, perhaps, the most potent power player in planet Earth geopolitics -- we can then use that template to nationalize other companies comprising the Military-Industrial Complex. I encourage you to review Dwight Eisenhower's "Farewell Address to the Nation," broadcast from the Oval Office on the eve of John Kennedy's inauguration: 

Eisenhower Reveals THE DEEP STATE: Ike's Farewell Address Televised From The Oval Office Sounds The Alarm That The "Military-Industrial Complex" Comprises The Greatest Threat To American Democracy By Making Us A Murderous Corporatocracy


(Yes, the history of nationalized companies is hideous. However, gifted, technocratic wonks, fundamentally committed to public service, are smart enough - and virtuous enough - to create an entirely new track record for nationalized companies.)

See: 
Video about Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund   https://www.facebook.com/reel/1537857818009298
(Norway's approach to quasi-nationalization works famously well.)

Compendium Of Best Pax-Barbaria Posts About Abraham Lincoln (... And The J-6 Insurrection That Lincoln Prophesied)

These members of the Trump family - and hundreds of capitalist billionaires like them - are bad actors, committed 24/7 to the hostile takeover of the United States and the destruction of the Rule of Law, under aegis of the Constitution. Like all sociopaths and psychopaths, these political and economic gangsters are intrinsically unable to feel guilt or shame.


Note well.

Time is running out.

If the "left side of the aisle" continues affirming our current liberal (and neo-liberal) model, then winning the White House in 2028 will be as disastrous as Joe Biden's remarkably decent and productive presidency, 

It is astonishingly easy to overlook the obvious:

Biden gave way - directly - to Trump, and for a second time!?! -- because the simple people who make up Trump's Base realized one fundamentally true thing: common folk (most of whom derive from farm families, blue-collar workers and manual laborers) have been systematically excluded from the left-wing's vision of prosperity, a vision disproportionately focused on academic accomplishment, a vision that did not accommodate formally uneducated blue-collar workers, or the underclass, or "suicidally disenfranchised opioid users" whose lives were cut short by an epidemic of "deaths by despair." These are the very people desperate enough to want Donald Trump to "shake things up," thus tossing the nation from the frying pan into the fire. https://www.fau.edu/newsdesk/articles/deaths-of-despair-study.php

All these desperate people were systematically left behind.

Now, to prevent their desperation from "killing us all" (with democracy being the first casualty), we need to build a new America based on the assertive assumption that a modicum of real prosperity will be everyone's portion, and that by looking upon all wealth as Common Wealth, everyone will enjoy the third of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Four Freedoms: "Freedom from Want." https://share.google/aimode/weo6nBJ8jnSpsRLvi  (A "commonwealth" is a traditional English term dating to the 15th century meaning the "common well-being" or "public welfare.")

I propose that the name of the evolving Democratic Party be changed to "The Common Wealth Party," and that its motto be excerpted from the Preamble to the United States Constitution: "Dedicated to Promoting the General Welfare." (Retiring Illinois Senator Dick Durbin observed - brilliantly - that the current motto of the Republican Party is, "We are all in this...... alone.")

For decades -- at least since "The Greatest Generation" returned from its antifascist/antifa victory over Hitler -- "the uneducated" for whom Donald Trump professes his love, have been dumbed down by craven acquisitiveness, at the behest of a supposedly "democratic capitalist" System that impels us to "buy things we don't need, with money we don't have, to impress people we don't like." 

Cowboy Capitalism (which is to say oppressive, exclusionary, winner-take-all Capitalism) has transformed formerly "responsible citizens" into Pavlovian "consumer units."

"The Greatest Generation: Labor, Capital And Betrayal Of The Social Contract"


George Carlin: Everything You Need To Know About American Society And Politics: "Just Promise The Doofuses New Gizmos"

Couple America's passion for mostly meaningless possessions with the nation's persistent anti-intellectual contempt-for-learning -- and we end up with Know-Nothing Christian Nationalists taking their cues from bottom-dwelling televangelists like Joel Osteen, Franklin Graham and Tammy and Jim Bakker, every one of these Christian Nationalists completely surrendered to their unshakable belief in "sola fide" ("salvation by faith alone"), and the corollary belief that Jesus is "coming back to save them." 

And Lo!!! 

They need not lift a finger to make the world a better place. 

Jesus is going to take away all the boo-boos, make everything nice-and-bourgeois and indistinguishable from their bogus vision of the Nazarene, which is to say, their view of heaven will be filled with people just like them. 

 Jim Bakker Resurrected: If This Doesn't Scare The Bejesus Out Of You, Repent For Your End Is Near!



Google AI's elaboration of Fuller's insight:
Fuller frequently critiqued what he viewed as dysfunctional, obsolete governance structures (such as politics, politicians, and rigid national borders), arguing that humanity should treat Earth like a unified system ("Spaceship Earth"). He believed that direct opposition to broken systems only exhausts our energy and reinforces their defenses, whereas designing a superior alternative naturally renders the old system irrelevant. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Other Notable Quotations with the Same Core Vision
If you are looking for similar quotes by notable thinkers that advocate for building entirely new visions rather than trying to fix or fight broken governance, these quotes align perfectly:


Albert Einstein:
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them."



Thomas Kuhn (on systemic paradigm shifts):
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."


A Sovereign Wealth Fund, or what I would call a Common Wealth Fund, (right alongside "The Common Wealth Party" as the next "incarnation of the Democratic Party) is not the only way to finance a modicum of universal prosperity.

What I envision is a top-to-bottom, stem-to-stern re-working of the inheritance tax so that every billionaire WILL die a billionaire, and every multi-billionaire's wife, and every multi-billionaire's child, will also inherit a billion dollars. 

Here are two correlative approaches by Bernie Sanders and United Airlines CEO, Scott Kirby.

Bernie's Annual Billionaire Tax in detail: 
(This talk is informative throughout, but for brevity's sake, I encourage you to watch the first 16 minutes.)

Google AI Overview of Bernie's Annual Billionaire Tax proposal: https://share.google/aimode/LD5QbjyjY5Ne9Vvq4

*****


Crucially, we must understand that any kind of wealth tax will take into account the fact that, for the Ultra-Rich, income is trivial. 

The lion's share of wealth held by the Ungodly Rich is held in investments that come under the rubric of "unrealized capital gains," a sadly problematic phenomenon. 

Fortunately, Trevor Noah has provided a precise and humorous definition of "unrealized capital gains. https://share.google/aimode/3h70yAxreVtu7t5NL


*****

By way of conclusion...








Ken Burns' documentary, "The Roosevelts: An Intimate History" is indispensable viewing for understanding our historical moment and our historical quandary.
Fortunately, "The Roosevelts" is every bit as dramatic as Oscar-winning dramas.




 






Too Much And Never Enough


Insert meme here
I support gradual renaming of the Democratic Party as “The Common Wealth Party.”
By gradual renaming, I mean that Democratic politicians all start using the phrase Common Wealth as a way of accustoming American citizens to think of wealth generation as a community effort, and not a heroic effort by a few ultra-rich individuals who pretend they deserve ALL the profits arising from The System that they themselves have rigged, without sharing it in ways that ensure a modicum of prosperity for ALL citizens.
Basically, it is the Democratic Party's task to start calling capitalist pigs, “pigs,” but without using that word.
Once our use of the phrase, Commonwealth (Common Wealth) becomes commonplace, it will be obvious to Americans that some measure of equitable distribution of wealth is a good thing, whereas winner-take-all capitalism is a criminal enterprise that infects all society with the sicknesses of poverty, criminality and psychosocial-economic pauperization.





The unmitigated mess MAGA world has made of contemporary American society was not just predicted, but prophesied -- with minutely granular accuracy -- 
by Spanish philosopher, José Ortega y Gasset, in his 1929 book, "La Rebelión de las Masas" (translated as "The Revolt of the Masses" in 1930)

I have NEVER encountered such an insightful, bedrock description of America's "Great Unraveling" - and the concomitant collapse of American society - as the description contained in the groundbreaking work, "The Revolt of The Masses," by visionary Spanish philosopher, José Ortega y Gasset, which left an indelible impression on me as an undergraduate at the University of Toronto in the 1960s, and on Bob Dylan in the early 70s.


The Incipient Unraveling Of The Western World As Seen By Visionary Spanish Philosopher José Ortega y Gasset (1929)

Is Ortega Y Gasset The Most Important Modern Philosopher? The Most Discerning Prophet?



FINIS