Friday, September 25, 2026

No One Can Fault This Argument For How To Transform American Politics And, By Extension, World Politics, So That EVERYONE Will Be Comfortably Wealthy. Go Ahead. Try! I Dare You!

 

Norway's "Sovereign Wealth Fund" Owns About 1.5% Of Every Publicly Traded Company In The World

If you don't believe this claim, here is a brief video explanation of how it happened, plus Google AI's validation of the video's content.

Video about Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1537857818009298

*****

Google AI's Validation Of The Claims Made In The Above Video

https://share.google/aimode/araVAhCVexwpMekbJ

Design scientist and philosopher (of "the intersection between technology and theology"), Buckminster Fuller, observed "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."

This post which feels to me like the most important political document I have ever written probes the "new model" which makes the old model ridiculous, and does so in a way that everybody can understand the prevalent absurdity of what has "always" passed for inalterable reality.

If you disagree, please make your argument and send it to me: alanarchibaldo@gmail.com


I cannot recommend strongly enough that you view Ken Burn's documentary series, "The Roosevelts: An Intimate History."

"The Roosevelts: An Intimate History," AI Google Overview: https://share.google/aimode/oLdEVr9fIVbgdPQ55

PBS Overview Of The Roosevelts: An Intimate History - https://www.pbs.org/kenburns/the-roosevelts/about

"The Roosevelts: An Intimate History," Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Roosevelts_(miniseries)

"The Roosevelts" explains how FDR, inspired by the progressive politics of his 5th cousin, President Teddy Roosevelt, decided that government must not stand idly by while American oligarchs, plutocrats and kakistocrats prolong the ruse that "real Americans" must lift themselves up by their own bootstraps.

FDR asserted that Human Well-Being is a human right. https://share.google/aimode/eDG6S4xyg14mAnrzb

And Franklin "welcomed the hatred" of the "economic royalists" who wished to roll back his democratizing accomplishments, just as the current Republican Party is entirely dedicated to doing.


Video of Roosevelt's "I Welcome Their Hatred" speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjSTQwamo8M

If you don't have time to watch all 14 hours (as I have now done twice), just watch Episode #5. 



Trump is a malefactor of great wealth.

And in light of this fact, I'm going to get into the faces of my fellow liberals and progressives.

The Democratic Party has become effete because it lacks sufficient courage to say, "We welcome your hatred."

Trump won the Oval Office twice because he knew that people were REALLY ready to shake things up.

We liberals and progressives need to take that very maneuver from Trump's playbook in order to propose a seismic shakeup in American governance, primarily by recognizing that we have always lived in an oligarchy with democratic trappings, but now have devolved into a plutocracy-kakistocracy which life-long conservative David Brooks has categorize in the following words:


Here is the staggering, amount of wealth that America's richest 10% have sequestered for themselves since Donald Trump first took office.

This is more obscence than pornography.

What's more Trump is proud of his greed, eagerly admitting that he "loves money."



"The Love Of Money Is The Root Of All Evil" - An Open Invitation To Christian Conservatives


And here's is a compendium of the second-worst evil Trump has normalized.

The Normalization Of Cruelty During Donald Trump's Administration: A Compendium


And here is what America's Unbridled, Cowboy Capitalism has wrought:




Enough!

Let the mofos know that they've been found out and that they are dedicated 24/7 to killing EVERYTHING meaningful in "The American Dream."

And we don't spread the word, it is because each of us is a c____d.

A clue!

The word is not cyanid.

*****

How To Make A Millionaire Of Every Person Living In Poverty As Norway Has Already Done

I had a brainstorm today.

There are several interrelated parts to my brainstorm.

Although the ultimate goal of my proposal is to eliminate poverty - and in the process make the United States more prosperous place - it will be First necessary to the wealthy in a roundabout way.

Clearly, the wealthy - and even more so ultra-wealthy billionaires - refuse to be taxed in any meaningful way (which, by my lights, means taxing their unrealized capital gains).

My immediate thought was that nobody can spend $1 billion in our lifetime, And so my initial impulse was to tax the welfare money they have excess of $1 billion.

But the welfare are powerful enough to ensure that this real allocation of wealth is a non-starter.

And so let billionaires keep all of their money, but with the obligation that they use their net worth in excess of $1 billion (or one billion per child) to play the same financial games they always play, which is to say they will use their excess capital to invest as they see fit in order to make more money.

Billionaires have far more than enough money to purchase the necessities of life with the "lone" billion that is "left," even after devoting their supernumerary billions to grow  "The General Welfare." (The preamble to the Constitution -- which is, in effect, the mission statement of the Constitution -- reads: 

Note that the Preamble even uses the dread word, "welfare."

In any event, there will be no interruption in the way billionaires live their lives, as they go about their customary business of accumulating even more money.

Money accumulation is The Game they play.

So let them play it.

After all, they’re good at it.

However, when they die, only $1 billion devolves to each of their blood heirs, whereas all the rest goes to a federal government fund that would be used to finance "the infancy accounts" of all American newborns.

Senator Corey Booker has long been a proponent of these infancy accounts, and in the last year Donald Trump himself has created an account of similar type, called "Trump Accounts."


Kiplinger Magazine calls "Trump Accounts" "no-brainers": https://www.kiplinger.com/personal-finance/savings/trump-accounts-how-to-apply

These Baby Bonds - financed by the federal government which deposits into them at regular intervals, take advantage of what is often called “the miracle of compound interest.” 

Here is what happens by virtue of this “miracle.”

When $250,000.00 is deposited into each newborn’s "savings account" with a 6% interest rate, that initial deposit will make each and every child a millionaire by age 23.4. Here's the math: https://share.google/aimode/btjhziYpfvmv6aRM9

Keep in mind the annual cost of imprisoning that 3% to 4% of the population currently behind bars is  in a country where "the average annual cost for keeping a prisoner behind bars is $46,411 per year, while the state average is roughly $45,000 to $50,000 per year, with individual states ranging from $23,000 to over $130,000. 
Here's the math: https://share.google/aimode/2PTgoZ2IkWS0FaZA8 
Here's the imprisonment math: https://share.google/aimode/DU2UQybKIrpcpyWFD

And note well that this 3% to 4% imprisonment rate for poor people is seven (7) times higher than the imprisonment rate for the general population.

If, as the statistics indicate, we were to lower the imprisonment rate by 14.3%, most impoverished prisoners will no be a drain on government budgets by requiring social services, nor will they be inclined to live lives of crime to insure the survival of themselves and their families (just as the protagonist of “Les Miserables” - Jean Valjean became a criminal in order to ensure his own family’s survival.)

The overall result of my proposal would be the elimination of poverty, and the overall enrichment of American society because more resources will be available for profitable investment, and every billionaire remains a billionaire. 

To be crystal clear, this expanded profitability will arise not only from "Baby Bonds" financed by the inheritance tax formula I outline above, but also from two additional spring boards: 1.) the money saved on social services will be put to profitable use, and, 2.) the money saved from the needlessness of mass incarceration will be put to profitable use.

Has Charlie Kirk would say, “Prove me wrong.”

*****

And if you don't think the above argument will enable material wellbeing for every human being, consider Warren Buffett's analysis and perhaps split the "funding" between "billionaire" inheritance tax, and increased corporate taxation so that the contribution of just 200 American companies paying the same tax rate that Buffett's company, Berkshire Hathaway, happily pay would put us "way over the top":

Warren Buffett Blows The Cover Of The Ultra-Wealthy. If We Focus On Propagating Buffett's Revelation -- Only This One Revelation -- The Ruling Class's Overarching (And Nearly Invisible) Structure Of Dominance-Submission-Bondage Would Come To A Prompt Crashing End



I venture that ONLY capitalist pigs will disagree.

Notably, the vast majority of capitalists who refuse to accept regulation are demonstrably piggish. 

Unregulated, "feral" capitalists will oppose these proposals tooth.

But their only argument is that they want to continue being piggish when a billion dollars for themselves (and another billion for each of their children) is more than enough money for any healthy, contributory, responsible citizen who is interested in the General Welfare.

Remember.

The damage done to the body politic by not using the nation's "commonwealth" to eliminate poverty is monstrous. Grotesque. Mean-spirited and malicious by any Judeo-Christian measure.

And in the process, the United States will become a model of universal prosperity, and instead of the wealthy fleeing the country (which would be an apt measure of their hatred for promoting The General Welfare), "everyone" will want to come here - especially those clever, creative people who have not yet made their first billion.

Keep in mind that I am not against Capitalism.

To the contrary, I am all for it - at least as it Capitalism began in America, with company charters needing to satisfy the terms laid down by the community... and if the did not, their charters would be revoked. Her is the truth of the matter: https://share.google/aimode/Cx3QKOK7YZRQepzqa

I heartily support "stakeholder capitalism," an area in which Ronald Reagan and Elizabeth Warren are in complete agreement.

"The Hidden History Of Corporations" --- And Ronald Reagan's "Stakeholder Capitalism" (Which Elizabeth Warren Is "High On" Too)


*****

I think it would be wise to follow Norway's path in creating a "Sovereign Wealth Fund" to benefit every citizin equally, and I suggest we do this by way of nationalizing Artificial Intelligence companies.

To repeat the beginning of this essay... or, in case you're more amenable to reading my introduction now that you know only piggish capitalists (like Trump, Musk, Zuckerberg et al) stand in the way of prosperity in every American household.

 

Norway's "Sovereign Wealth Fund" Owns About 1.5% Of Every Publicly Traded Company In The World

If you don't believe this claim, here is a brief video explanation of how it happened, plus Google AI's validation of the video's content.

Video about Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1537857818009298

*****

Google AI's Validation Of The Claims Made In The Above Video

https://share.google/aimode/araVAhCVexwpMekbJ


*****

PS

Buckminster Fuller: Compendium Of Keen Observation, Wonderful Innovation, And Deep Dive Pursuit Of Truth -- Without Which We Have Nothing... No Matter How Wealthy We Might Measure Ourselves To Be





Today's Dialogue With Trump Supporter, Elaine, My Publisher Friend From Texas










Dear Elaine

Thanks for sending your "thoughts."

John Adams would not have "loved the uneducated" for the very reasons that Donald Trump does.  Adams would have educated them.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpdt7omPoa0

Having just watched the Ken Burns' documentary series for the second time, it seems that a simple test to determine if a person is interested in becoming educated is to see if they are willing to view (or at least "check out") "The Roosevelts: An Intimate History," covering 104 years in the lives of Teddy Roosevelt (a Republican Presidents), Franklin Delano Roosevelt (a Democratic president), and Eleanor Roosevelt, a progressive activist and wife of FDR.

If one watches this documentary and is not convinced that the Roosevelts showed the way of loyal citizenship and public service (whereas Donald Trump, by comparison, does not) then that person is, in my view, irredeemable, except as a political cipher to be manipulated by thoughtless political passions. 

image.png

John Adams, second president of the United States
Wikiquote page:

image.png

Compendium Of Best "Pax" Posts On The Cornerstone Necessity Of Education


image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

Compendium Of Best "Pax" Posts On The Cornerstone Necessity Of Education


image.png

Samuel Adams and John Adams were second cousins.

image.png

Compendium Of Best "Pax" Posts On The Cornerstone Necessity Of Education


Elaine, I'm interested to know if you remain a Trump supporter.

I also encourate you to check out "The Roosevelts: An Intimate History" which currently streams on Netflix. (Among my five favorite presidents, 3 are Republican - Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower whose Farewell speech was the most couragious talk ever given in the Oval Office: 

Eisenhower Reveals THE DEEP STATE: Ike's Farewell Address Televised From The Oval Office Sounds The Alarm That The "Military-Industrial Complex" Comprises The Greatest Threat To American Democracy By Making Us A Murderous Corporatocracy


In addition to being a highly-regarded work of historical documentation, the stem-to-stern drama of "The Roosevelts: An Intimate History" is every bit as engaging as the best movies I've seen recently - including "Inherit the Wind" (with Spencer Tracy), "Dial M for Murder" (by Alfred Hitchcock), "Twelve Angry Men" (with Henry Fonda), Dickens' "Great Expectations" (the 2011-2012 television mini-series), and Disney's feature length animation, "Scrooge."

Wishing you all good things.

Pax et amor

Alan 🌈🙏🍀

Monday, September 21, 2026

Huitlacoche Finds Its Inevitable Way Into American Cuisine. (When I Was A Boy, Dad Told Me About "Corn Smut" While Pottering About In The Back Garden)

Corn Smut In The Garden Can Be Viewed Either As Pest Or Pleasure

August 22, 2024 | By Julie Harker, University of Illinois 

Decades ago, when I discovered the pre-Colombian delicacy, huitlacoche, in central Mexico, I knew it was only a matter of time before enterprising American farmers would introduce this pre-Colombian delicacy “en el Norte.”
My Dad, who was an upstate New York farm boy — and a very good lifetime gardener of fruits, vegetables, and berries — was the first to introduce me to “corn smut.”
Not surprisingly, he had no idea that this “smut” was delectable, but only saw it as the destruction of another ear of his prized Golden Bantam sweet corn.
It is not hard to find canned huitlacoche in your neighborhood “tienda” (and sometimes in supermarkets!), but the taste of the canned product is to fresh huitlacoche what canned peas are to garden-fresh.
Caveat emptor.

See less
November 3, 2022 
Shared with Public
The cultivation of huitlacoche is a corn-belt fortune waiting to be made.