Here's how Trump pulled off his fascist coup. (This insight came to me yesterday, and came with the power of epiphany.)
Trump (aided and abetted by his slimy followers -- right up to and including "the originalists" on The Supreme Court) are well aware that there is no way to stop him -- even though the need to stop him is screamingly (and increasingly) self-evident.
How did this happen?
As the Founding Fathers pointed out; for the Constitution to work, it would be necessary for a critical mass of citizens - and politicians - to be virtuous people.
(Jeffrey Rosen, at Philadelphia's "The Constitution Center, has written a brilliant book about virtue - both civic and personal. It's titled "The Pursuit of Happiness: How Classical Writers on Virtue Inspired the Lives of the Founders and Defined America.)
Tragically, there is no longer a critical mass of virtuous citizens and politicians, and so we are no longer a basically virtuous people, ready and eager to discharge civic responsibilities. (Ubiquitous indoctrination by pleasure-seeking, unregulated Cowboy Capitalism is responsible for this reversal in America's psychological landscape, and I address the matter in my Bibliography below.)
Being a vice-ridden - and therefore vicious/vice-ious man - Trump simply runs roughshod over virtue -- not unlike paying $130,000.00 to bone porn stars -- and flaunts his corrupt vility, which in turn turns the attention of the populace to readily-available purchaseable pleasures, replacing any - even vestigial - acknowledgement of virtue's existential, epistemological and ontological primacy. (The etymology of "vicious": https://www.etymonline.com/word/vicious)
Even with virtue bloodied and beaten, it might seem there would be legal recourse to rein in a fascist dictator.
But here, my epiphany comes into play.
The Constitution only DEFINES the three branches of government (their operation and their implicit system of checks-and-balances), WITHOUT MENTIONING THE OVERARCHING SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES ITSELF.
And so, it is impossible to bring any lawsuit to restrain a tyrant because any such suit would not "have standing."
To "have standing" such a suit would have to cite the constitutional foundation-and-justification of the lawsuit, and THERE IS NONE.
There is nothing - not a word - about maintaining the system of checks-and-balances which IS written into the Constitution.
Of course, with the so-called "originalists" on the Supreme Court now serving as ass-licking, totally surrendered lackeys, there is no need for Trump to "pull this trump card."
But there it is -- an outrageous backstop -- just in case any "glimmering apparition of virtue" were to unsettle the conscience of His Malignancy's sympathizers-and-enablers who now make up what was once a virtuous, thoughtful, and august judicial body.
"The Supremes!"
Bibliography


No comments:
Post a Comment